Phenomenological subjectivity and consciousness – groundwork for an eco-phenomenology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5327/Z2176-94782207Keywords:
ecocentrism; eco-phenomenology; ecosphere; phenomenology; semiotics.Abstract
The present research aim to analyze the foundations of Husserl’s phenomenology and its legacy, employing its attributes in the creation of an eco-phenomenology toolset. The trend in question focuses on the notable revision of the subject-object relationship, introduced by Husserlian thought. From his repositioning of the reflective subject under the transcendental ego, Husserl authorizes the reconstitution of the cognitive and epistemological bases of thought on a set of entitative qualities, which equates the aware observer to the observed entitative universe, according to the similarity of existential conditions. Thus, the reflective character that sediments human experience is henceforth considered a natural phenomenon, contiguous to other transformations and determinations of meaning conferred by non-human beings—biotic and abiotic, demanding a re-conception of their phenomenological roles as semiotic agents (and, therefore, agents of environmental transformation). The perspective changes translated here provide us with an opportunity to approach and refine the proposal for an assembly (parliament) of non-humans presented in Latour’s work, thereby insinuating that the establishment of an ecocentric paradigm will only be possible under such philosophical conditions. Based on the massive version of this paradigm, the purpose is to review the scientific and political fundamentals for organizing the political scenario in favor of so-called ecological democracies.
Downloads
References
Descartes, R., 2008. Meditationes de prima philosophia – Lateinisch-Deutch. Felix Meiner Verlag, Harburg.
Gadamer, H.-G., 1990. Wahrheit und Methode - Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. In.: Gesammelte Werke 1 – Hermeneutik I. J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen.
Heidegger, M., 1996. Being and time – a translation of sein und zeit. Translation by: Joan Stambaugh. State University of New York Press, New York.
Husserl, E., 1966. méditations cartésiennes – introduction a la phénoménologie. París: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.
Husserl, E., 2014. Ideas for a pure phenomenology and phenomenological philosophy. Heckett Publishing Company, Indianapolis; Cambridge.
Latour, B., 1997. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. La Découverte, Paris.
Latour, B., 2000. Pandora’s hope – essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge; London.
Latour, B., 2004. Politics of nature – how to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge; London.
Latour, B., 2015. A dialog about a new meaning of symmetric anthropology. by interviewer Carolina Miranda (Accessed December 20, 2024) at:. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/146-CERISY-DESCOLApdf.pdf
Maran, T., 2020. Ecosemiotics: the study of signs in changing ecologies (elements in environmental humanities). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rubio, F.; Caldebella, P.F.; Guimarães, A.T.; Gonçalves, C.C.S., 2024. Sustainable valorization of Moringa oleifera Lam. co-products and zoo waste. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais, v. 59, e1816. https://doi.org/10.5327/Z2176-94781816.
Sharov, A.; Tønnessen, M., 2021. Semiotic Agency – science beyond mechanism. v. 25. Springer Nature, Baltimore; Stavanger.
Tarasti, E., 2015. Sein und Schein – explorations in existential semiotics. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin; Boston.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.